Whilst scratching around the travel section on the Guardian today I was a bit less amused than usual as I'd had the leisure this weekend to skim read the paper from cover to cover. Normally, at best I'd end up throwing it out a couple of weeks later, unread.
Anyway I normally use Trivago so scrape through different websites for good deals, but decided to have a nose at hotelsupermarket. Now I would have thought it would be a good site. But a quick snoop through "Budapest, Hungary" actually threw up loads of entries for Bodum, Turkey, and not all of them obvious. AVOID unless you want to find you've booked yourself into a hotel 1000 kms and 2 countries away.
I have also had trouble in the past with Netflights. For a start the site doesn't work with Firefox, you have to use Internet Explorer or find yourself unable to book anything. Secondly, the rates advertised for the two weeks I wanted in LAX in April were a good bit higher than the deal I got through Angus Rent a Car's CarTrawler system. And most annoyingly, not only did they not send me through a voucher for my hotel, but took a couple of days of phoning to get through and when they did send it, it looked very unprofessional - some hotels might not have accepted it. Again, one to avoid.
Skyscanner looks interesting. Skyscanner basically does what Ryanair doesn't do - matches up your cheap connecting flight to a cheap charter rather than finding yourself unable to get to some locations, notably classic resorts mainly serviced by package operators, except via horrendously expensive flights via mainstream operators.
You would understand Ryanair's unease about this kind of competition if they were losing business because of it, but intriguingly, they are probably gaining from this piggyback websites. For example, I know somebody who routinely travels the Belfast to Las Palmas route, but finds it really difficult to get a fairly priced direct deal. So she books separate connecting flights, usually entirely separately, and probably pays handsomely. So Skyscanner is the answer - pulling together the charters and the cheapies.
I think a good part of the problem is that Ryanair's site, once considered very novel, is now creaking and out of date compared to other operators, who now offer a far more sophisticated level of services via their websites. I suspect that a good overhaul would do Ryanair far more good than harm.
Note this post was updated thanks to more detailed information passed to me by Skyscanner below (1st Jul 09)
Monday, June 29, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






2 comments:
Hi Laura,
Thanks for blogging about Skyscanner, but part of what you’ve written is inaccurate.
We are not, and never have been, “embroiled in a legal battle with Ryanair”
If you could correct this, that would be appreciated.
Thanks
www.Skyscanner.net
My apologies, it seems that Skyscanner was unaffected by Ryanair's efforts to divert users away from scraper sites - more information here - http://news.skyscanner.net/articles/2008/08/000516-ryanair-comparison-site-cancellations-no-effect-on-skyscanner-users.html
It would appear that the reason for this is because Skyscanner send users to the Ryanair website rather than booking on their behalf, as some other sites were doing.
Post a Comment